False As-sumption?

Francis Gibb reports in The Times today that the expected appointment of Jonathan Sumption QC direct from the Bar to the Supreme Court is strongly opposed by senior judges because he has no experience as a full-time judge.

When I first pointed out a month ago that senior judges would be furious if Sumption were appointed to the current vacancy, readers noted that at least two outstanding post-war law lords — Lord Reid and Lord Radcliffe — were appointed in this way.

Sir Louis Blom-Cooper QC, editor of a recent history of of the law lords, also sings their praises.

But that was then (1948/49) and this is now. Sumption’s appointment would not be popular with anyone other than Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court. It would be better if Sumption did not apply this time round.

Underrated: Abroad

The ravenous longing for the infinite possibilities of “otherwhere”

The king of cakes

"Yuletide revels were designed to see you through the dark days — and how dark they seem today"
Search