You are here:   Civilisation >  Theatre > A True King Among Lears
 
A True King Among Lears
January/February 2011


Astonishing range: Derek Jacobi has complete authority over his audience 

For someone whose day job, like mine, is to comment on the cynicism and incompetence of current affairs, it is hard to express enthusiasm without embarrassment. It feels awkward to keep repeating how fortunate we are in this country to have a truly dazzling theatre culture. Yes, there are lots of third-rate productions here, and dismal experimental theatres and depressing thespian luvvies of all kinds. But at the same time, we have directors and designers and actors whose achievements defy cynicism.

Michael Grandage's King Lear at the Donmar Warehouse is one such inspiration. Grandage has been artistic director at the Donmar since 2002 and is responsible for the consistent creativity of this little theatre. His direction of Billy Budd at Glyndebourne last summer made it perhaps the most moving experience I have ever had in opera by bringing exceptional theatrical understanding to the music. His current Lear is of this same overwhelming, slightly claustrophobic quality. With Derek Jacobi as the King, this is among the best Lears I have seen, though the general standard is extremely high: it would be hard to better Michael Gambon as Lear, with Antony Sher as the Fool, at the RSC Barbican in 1983.

Jacobi has been a virtuoso for years and, at 72, still is. His mood and tone range is astonishing. Like all the best Lears, he moves almost imperceptibly and sometimes instantly from one emotion to another, across a huge range from whimpering to raging, speaking the Shakespearean verse as if he himself had just thought of it. He has that essential quality of a great actor — complete authority over the audience. So too do Kent (Michael Hadley) and the Fool (Ron Cook), and Gwilym Lee as Poor Tom is well on the way to achieving it. All three of them, in this desolate play, manage to bring emotional power to goodness, even in meaningless defeat. I've always thought that Lear is the best statement of the best of existentialism.

Grandage's production opens on Christopher Oram's entirely bare set, with walls heavily smeared with chalky-white clay and earth, expressing like an abstract painting the extreme bleakness of Shakespeare's vision. It is the same earth with which the naked Tom will smear himself on the blasted heath, and the same earth to which the play keeps reminding us we will all come. The timeless costumes and the almost complete absence of props contribute to the sense of stripped-down, abstract humanity — a central preoccupation of the play.

Yet at the same time, Grandage has partly domesticated some of the central characters. In this interpretation, Jacobi's red-faced, vainglorious and febrile irascibility, his campy vanity and his lack of self-awareness combined with moments of self-doubt, present Lear as everyone's idea of the nightmare rich old father — capricious, unreasonable, unpleasant and clearly likely to get much worse. For once, it is possible to feel some sympathy, at first, with his daughters Regan and Goneril when he puts himself in their power. Such tragedies are enacted across suburbia, too. Having a thankless child may be sharper than a serpent's tooth, but so too is having a monstrous parent who sets his children against each other.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.