You are here:   Features > The Operation That Can Ruin Your Life

A photographic exhibition at the Hammer Museum, University of California Los Angeles, shows a comparative study between teenage girls and adult male-to-female transsexuals 

Last year, I was nominated for the Stonewall Journalist of the Year award. This seemed fair enough since I write prolifically about sexuality and sexual identity. But I guessed that Stonewall would not dare give me the prize, because a powerful lobby affiliated with the lesbian and gay communities had been hounding me for five years. Six weeks later I, along with a police escort, walked past a huge demonstration of transsexuals and their supporters, shouting "Bindel the Bigot". Despite campaigning against gender discrimination, rape, child abuse and domestic violence for 30 years, I have been labelled a bigot because of a column I wrote in 2004 that questioned whether a sex change would make someone a woman or simply a man without a penis. Subsequently, I was "no platformed" by the National Union of Students Women's Campaign, a privilege previously afforded to fascist groups such as the BNP. As a leading feminist writer, I now find that a number of organisations are too frightened to ask me to speak at public events for fear of protests by transsexual lobbyists. 

The 2004 column was about a Canadian male-to-female transsexual who had taken a rape crisis centre to court over its decision not to invite her to be a counsellor for rape victims. Feminists tend to be critical of traditional gender roles because they benefit men and oppress women. Transsexualism, by its nature, promotes the idea that it is "natural" for boys to play with guns and girls to play with Barbie dolls. The idea that gender roles are biologically determined rather than socially constructed is the antithesis of feminism. 

I wrote: "Those who ‘transition' seem to become stereotypical in their appearance — f**k-me shoes and birds' nest hair for the boys; beards, muscles and tattoos for the girls. Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease."

Gender dysphoria (GD) was invented in the 1950s by reactionary male psychiatrists in an era when men were men and women were doormats. It is a term used to describe someone who feels strongly that they should belong to the opposite sex and that they were born in the wrong body. GD has no proven genetic or physiological basis. 

A review for the Guardian in 2005 of more than 100 international medical studies of post-operative transsexuals by the University of Birmingham's Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility found no robust scientific evidence that gender reassignment surgery was clinically effective. It warned that the results of many gender reassignment studies were unsound because researchers lost track of more than half of the participants. 

The past decade has seen an increase in the number of people diagnosed as transsexual. There are now 1,500-1,600 new referrals a year to one of the handful of gender identity clinics in Britain. About 1,200 receive treatment on the NHS with the rest going private, Thailand being the main country of choice. The largest clinic, at Charing Cross Hospital in London, saw 780 new referrals last year. The NHS carried out some 150 operations in the last year (up from about  100 in 2005-2006). Apart from Thailand, the country with the highest number of sex-change operations is Iran where, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. When sex-change surgery is performed on gay men, they become, in the eyes of the gender defenders, heterosexual women. Transsexual surgery becomes modern-day aversion therapy for gays and lesbians. 

View Full Article
December 8th, 2013
8:12 PM
that is the typical bullshit a non transsexual being will say. yeah there are problems in the issue, as we don't have full lesbian and gay and whatever acceptance and directions are often shown without alternatives to some that just aren't sure what they are, but if u are a transsexual woman (my perspective) that went through the wrong puberty u would know what real torture and prison feels like. if u don't get diagonsed children on blockers as soon as needed and let them xpress themselves u can start dig a grave for them. as they sure as hell will do anything to stop this torture and if parents and physicians won't do it, then the child will try to end this suffering. i wan't to kill the prison i'm in, because of the wrong puberty and i wouldn't think about it, if i wouldn't have the male puberty results that are unchangeable. imagine being a trans child of julie, hello nightmare. simply said, if u deny a clear diagnosed transsexual child blockers and later hormones u are killing it. there is no grey zone here. there is no life in the wrong body, there is just death.

November 7th, 2013
10:11 PM
Would you like to come and comfort my 17 year old FTM son when he is suicidal, Julie? Transsexualism was not 'invented' it's pure torment for anyone going through it. My son knew at 5 years old that he was in the wrong body, and if I and the professionals in this very 'behind' country were more educated then puberty blockers given before puberty would literally save lives. My son suffers daily, with numerous things that go with being transgender. And he is one of the lucky ones that was put on blockers at 15 and testosterone at 16. But it's still destroying his poor worn out mind having to live in the wrong body, with body parts that are alien to him. You need to seriously stop with the 'textbook' clichéd talk and LISTEN. I don't care what transphobic people have to say I would do literally anything to get my son surgery right this minute to end his suffering. You are very stereotypical and immune to humanity.

October 7th, 2013
7:10 AM
Well, am in the middle of it now, been living with a MTF pre op, on hormones for 8 yrs and I know what it is like. Way to many militant attitudes, the worst coming from the Gender Fluid Community. Fact- Gender has everything to do with it. My partner wears the shoes and hair whilst saying she is neither male nor female but is getting the surgery and is fast tracking it with the Phych's help.She wears female attire and wants female anatomy but yells for equality and to not be labeled one way or the other and all the while is developing what I call a groupie following who think they are liberated and fashionable because they know [?] her. Transgender is the latest thing it seems, just take a good look at what is really going on.I accept her in the body she came in but she wants it all regardless of what it takes and who gets hurt and for what at the end of the day? Its becoming fashionable, to many Drs diagnose [...put label here]...without knowing what they are doing. How do I know there is a problem? Its shouting dissenters down, silencing anyone who may question or want to discuss what is going on, even I am put through hell if I suggest anything that is not in full agreement with the Gender Party Line . I am a straight female who loves a man who wants to be a woman or is already a woman with a male body or is it more that he was born with a female brain? The whole thing is becoming a parody .

September 19th, 2013
12:09 AM
Sigh. I don't even know where to begin, but the author of this article clearly does not understand what it is to be transsexual. Let me dissect some examples: --"Transsexualism, by its nature, promotes the idea that it is "natural" for boys to play with guns and girls to play with Barbie dolls. The idea that gender roles are biologically determined rather than socially constructed is the antithesis of feminism." Julie Bindel: how did you come by this conclusion? Transexualism is about gender, not gender roles. The two are separate. If anything transsexuals highlight the differences between gender and gender roles, forcing people to question their pre-conceptions of gender. That could only help feminists, who are on a similar mission to force society to look inward about gender preconceptions. -- "Those who ‘transition' seem to become stereotypical in their appearance — f**k-me shoes and birds' nest hair for the boys; beards, muscles and tattoos for the girls. Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease." The above statement is ironic is so many ways. A feminist fighting against an overly simplified view of women is professing an overly simplified view of transsexuals! As a transsexual woman I can say the author has no idea who I really am. I never go for birds nest hair, and I avoid heels as a rule in general. The above quote exhibits a very narrow view of transsexuals, one into which I and many other transsexuals do not fall. Does the author judge acceptability based on appearance? If so, then she would never ever guess that I am transsexual. Perhaps it has never occurred to her that we, as transsexual women, not only face social issues toward transsexuals, but we ALSO face social issues against women! Yes, Julie Bindel, I am transsexual AND I also face gender discrimination. I am as aware of it as you are. No, I am more aware because I have spent time on both sides of the social spectrum. I've seen and experienced a drop in authority as a woman. It sucks! Mrs. Bindel , you have lots learn about us. If anything we are allies. -- "Gender dysphoria (GD) was invented in the 1950s by reactionary male psychiatrists in an era when men were men and women were doormats. …. GD has no proven genetic or physiological basis." Firstly, scientific understanding of transsexualism is in its infancy. In fact genetics is still in its infancy. We will see, eventually, what genetic traits causes many human conditions. As a scientist I believe transsexualism will be found to have a physiological cause, but that is just my opinion. I, however, will not draw a conclusion based on a lack of research. Secondly, gender dysphoria is not an invention of man; if anything you might say it was recognised by psychiatrists (not invented). -- "Recent legislation (the Gender Recognition Act, which allows people to change sex and be issued with a new birth certificate) will have a profoundly negative effect on the human rights of women and children." The above is pure speculation, and uses sensational wording to draw a fear-based blanket statement. Julie, do the human rights of the transgendered simply not factor into your thinking? Do our rights count? Finally, how do you know the effect will be profoundly negative? It could very well be positive by, once again, causing society to question its norms and leading to increased tolerance across the board. -- "According to this definition, a girl who plays football is trans-sexual." The author clearly misread the definition. If she’d understood it, then she’d have seen the definition (and the entire article from which it was quoted ) is actually about two things: 1. “gender non-conforming youth”, and 2. “transgender youth”. If she'd accurately applied the concepts described in the article, then her statement would have read, “According to this definition, a girl who plays football is gender non-comforming, “ (NOT transsexual, as she wrote). Some of the author’s points were valid; however I found this article to be a mostly ignorant editorial view of transsexuality. I am not sure why the author fails to see the parallels between women’s rights and transgendered rights, but we are both fighting for the same ideals. Finally, the author should understand that her expressed views are to transsexuals as the resistant views of some men were to the women’s suffrage movement, and later the feminist movement. It would be nice to see a person like this come around and finally see past their preconceptions, but it would involve a lot of insight on her part.

September 15th, 2013
6:09 PM
I am glad I am not the only person who thinks this phenomenon of transsexualism is anti-feminist and anti-queer. I think a large reason it has become so quickly normalized is that it both reinforces gender stereotypes and is profitable to a lot people.

September 8th, 2013
11:09 AM
Your article shows some horror at the idea of losing a "perfectly functioning penis" and you see transgendered as dressing like drag queens. Transgenderism is not about wanting to be allowed to join the sewing club, or the football team, if we really want that we can break the gender stereotypes even at the cost of being seen as "Genderqueer", but most about the person and their perception of themselves. Personally I have not liked myself (my body and gender) deeply since around 10 years old, but I am a patient person and this has manifested in an indifference to life. Life has not been unkind to me, but truly while I normally do not want to die I don't really fear it and sometimes I get a real black depression for days on end when I do think of suicide. The problem is I do not feel I have something to live for with my life as it is, for that reason I would seek counselling and hopefully get good honest advice. In the end, while more impulsive people will suicide or change to fix what they perceive is wrong with them, eventually everyone has to face that they have one life and they have to make the most of it. For this reason I believe gender reassignment is a very good treatment (after all when 6000 30-44 year olds commit suicide every year we really want to be bring that number DOWN and not up!) The counselling is designed to try to weed out those who want SRS for the ultimate thrill of being the opposite gender, some people will always bluff their way through and truly make an awful mistake. But that should not be held as a reason to deny treatment to those that it will benefit.

August 23rd, 2013
11:08 PM
I wonder why too much people (such as the author of this pitiful article) don't make their own businness? Why they don't let people, who are so different to them, live as they like and want? Do they live to love or to hate? ... I don't wonder that this world is, just because such people, a world of constant conflicts, and of sad and angry living beings...

Merit Coba
August 16th, 2013
1:08 PM
I read this article and it made me feel at peace. Who, except for a small hardcore minority, would even want to listen to Julie Bindel? Perhaps she is right and some profound wisdom can be found in her words, but the sad thing is that there is not one inch of feeling for those she condemns rightly or wrongly. If she is the model of a true feminist, then the world is a sad place, for regardless of right or wrong, to be right is one thing, but to be right without mercy is another. True feminism is colder than the harshest winter. As such feminism loses for Bindels hard cold approach condemns it to be a fringe movement. The more she writes with this hard distant hand the less credible her kind of feminism becomes. I never heard of her till this day and tomorrow I will have forgotten her. And so will 99,99% of the world.

January 3rd, 2013
4:01 AM
Quite curious that this article is all about MTFs and FTMs are not mentioned at all, almost as if they were... erased. Your Janice Raymond is showing.

December 18th, 2012
2:12 AM
i speak as the heterosexual female ex-partner of a trans mtf...julie has a point, but anyone questioning the right to pursue the permanent and drastic body changes should expect some histrionics from the trans community and the trans allies. i am filled with horror at the idea of my partners plans to mutilate herself. if i can accept and love her with a penis, her insistence on having a surgeon remove her perfect, functioning penis, and throw it in a bin, feels to me like the worst kind of rejection and insult to our years of intimacy and lovemaking. when i respect her identity and sexuality , despite being decieved and conned for years that she was in fact a heterosexual man, lying and covering her tracks regarding previous relationships and previous attempts at transition, where was the respect for my sexuality and identity all this time? when i say reassignment surgery would crucify me, i mean it. it is not my body. it is not my decision. but it would still crucify me. maybe im just selfish. or maybe im just a transphobic prude eh? interestingly, while tgs claim it is not a mental illness, that is precisely the reason they get treatment on the nhs and cosmetic treatment at that,(you cant change your chromosomes) which cisgender women are denied. not only that, they are frequently paid disability benefits and the welfare state pays for top of the range cosmetics and cosmetic treatments that cisgender women, slogging away in the real world, could only dream of. the irony is not lost on me, that a mans womanly needs are protected much more fiercely than a womans womanly needs...

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.