You are here:   Reputations >  Overrated > Overrated: Paul Krugman
 

And yet, with all this extra borrowing and all this spending Britain's economy is still tanking. Perhaps this suggests that massive deficit spending isn't the answer. That's one interpretation. Not for Krugman. To him the problem is that even the record levels of borrowing which will see Britain's national debt increase by 60 per cent, from £1 trillion to £1.6 trillion, by the next election, are not enough. We need to borrow more. That, he claims, would solve our debt crisis.  

Krugman's new book (its recommended retail price an aggregate demand boosting £14.99) is called End This Depression Now! (Norton) as though that hadn't previously occurred to anyone else. Indeed, it's possible that if George Osborne decided to increase borrowing to 10 or 12 per cent of GDP we might have a quarter or two of growth. Labour managed to boost GDP growth to 1 per cent by dumping £160 billion of borrowed money into the economy. 

But after that? Don't ask Krugman. He follows John Maynard Keynes who, accurately but none too helpfully, observed: "In the long run we are all dead." Actually, if you did ask Krugman, you might get a response like the one he gave when the dot com bubble burst: "To fight this recession the Fed needs . . . soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment . . . Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble."

That worked out fine, didn't it? Well yes, in Krugman's terms it did. Sure, we are now living with the effects of the bursting of that bubble but we did get a few good years of rocketing property prices which made us all feel as though we were getting richer just by sitting in our homes. And now that bubble has burst we just inflate a new one somewhere else. And when that bursts we inflate a new one. And when that bursts . . . 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Larry E
July 18th, 2012
5:07 PM
Pulp economist Krugman abandoned any scientific or economic integrity long ago, replacing it with pure partisan politics. In his drive to support Obama's policies, Krugman is all, "Tax more, tax more, stimulate the economy more, spend more, the government needs more money." Krugman is the Ex-Lax economist, always attempting to "stimulate" the economy and so support Obama. P.S. I like the novel approach to captcha used on this page. At least we humans can READ the damned thing.

Fred Soddy
July 13th, 2012
12:07 PM
Fifth form rant wrenching quotes out of context. Must do better.

Ron Edge
June 28th, 2012
7:06 PM
Oh, c'mon!! You know as well as I do that the vast majority of that money, under some tricky means, is going to the Financiers of ine strip or another, who, largely, created the Crash in '08 by their "Bad Bets" and, in many cases in the USA, the outright lying/cheating of home buyers. Allowing Commodities Brokers to take the same route of Farmers meant that rampant Speculation is strangling those at, or near the Poverty Levels. Same for Medical Bankruptcies whose condition has soared but is no longer a situation for which ANY of the 99% can no longer use to declare Bankruptcy... since...'06? Not germane, you say? These people are wiped out and not likely to be among the taxpaying public for some time to come; since this situation affects ("Afflicts", might be a better word since its been imposed on the 99%) 100's of thousands, this lowers the Tax Base available, no? "Supply-Side Economics" is what caused the '08 crash and, since Obama, you wouldn't know for all the whining on the Right, hasn't done a damn thing different than Cheney, Bush or any other NeoCon. So, whether Obama or Romney is elected, expect more of the same; with the economy in the dumps, when its not being shipped to our deadly enemies in the Middle East, China and Russia, to name three. All-in-all, I'd say that

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.