You are here:   Blogs >Joshua Rozenberg > Terrorism and Human Rights
Standpoint Blogs
Joshua Rozenberg
Tuesday 8th June 2010
Terrorism and Human Rights

The president of the Supreme Court defended the Human Rights Act tonight as "a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism".

Delivering the Gresham College special lecture at Lincoln's Inn, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers argued that a failure to respect human rights would fuel support for terrorism.

This is how Britain's most senior judge developed his argument.

The so called "war against terrorism" is not so much a military as an ideological battle. Respect for human rights is a key weapon in that ideological battle. Since the Second World War we in Britain have welcomed to the United Kingdom millions of immigrants from all corners of the globe, many of them refugees from countries where human rights were not respected. It is essential that they and their children and grandchildren should be confident that their adopted country treats them without discrimination and with due respect for their human rights.

If they feel that they are not being fairly treated, their consequent resentment will inevitably result in the growth of those who, actively or passively are prepared to support terrorists who are bent on destroying our society. The Human Rights Act is not merely their safeguard. It is a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism.

Lord Phillips is, of course, right in saying that Britain should respect the human rights of immigrants. But there seems to be no evidence that people turn to terrorism because their rights are not respected. And it must be even harder to sustain the corollary of that argument - that respecting the rights of immigrants will reduce the risk of attack by terrorists. Those behind the London bombings of 7 July 2005 are not thought to have been concerned about any perceived inadequacies in the Human Rights Act.

Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
June 20th, 2010
10:06 AM
Our principles include embracing the rationality of the Enlightenment. Terrorism is the perfect storm of mass travel bringing us too close to youth bulge conflicts. Terrorism stems from societies which do not protect their women and children from domestic abuse. Its all a matter of reason and public health. If we accept into our midst people who carry a burden of the potential to slip into dangerous states of mind we must be open about it and offer them all the treatment they would need.Or we should just refuse them entry.People turn to terrorism because they were starved in utero ,or have trans generational trauma of one sort or another. It has nothing to do with politics or even religion. Other than the problem that Islam supports gender apartheid. This has never yet done anything other than damage maternal and infant health both mental and physical. We have had an understanding of mental health for years but eveyone seems to ignore it.

June 9th, 2010
9:06 PM
Lord Phillips is talking rot. This is cognitive egocentricism at work - we're at fault and being attacked for betraying our principles. Nothing of the sort. We have a fundamental duty towards our people - to protect them from the threats facing them. Neoconservative? Moi?

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
About Joshua Rozenberg

Joshua Rozenberg is an independent legal commentator who presents Law in Action on BBC Radio 4.

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics