You are here:   Blogs >Focus on Islamism > Islam4UK Ban - Why So Late?
Standpoint Blogs
 
 
Focus on Islamism
Wednesday 13th January 2010
Islam4UK Ban - Why So Late?

ALEXANDER MELEAGROU-HITCHENS

Yesterday, Home Secretary Alan Johnson banned Islam4UK in what seemed a knee-jerk reaction to their planned march in Wootten Bassett.  Although the ban has come late and was quite clearly done with the upcoming election in mind, it is still the right move.

Up until now, Islam4UK (also known as al-Muhajiroun (AM)) has effectively been operating in a ‘legal bubble', as they are no different - in terms of membership and ideology - from al Ghuraaba (AG) and Saved Sect (SS), organisations that were proscribed in 2006 under the Terrorism Act 2000. 

This history of this group is a bit confusing, so bear with me.  AM was the original name of the group after it splintered from Hizb ut-Tahrir under Omar Bakri Mohammed in 1996. It operated under this name until 2005, when Tony Blair announced that it would be banned.  In response, the group disbanded before the ban and established two offshoots, SS and GG: both of which were proscribed in 2006.   This is when things went wrong: after the 2006 ban the group changed names yet again, this time to Ahl ul-Sunnah  Wa al-Jamaah (ASWJ).  No action was taken against ASWJ even though its supposed leader, Simon Keeler, was imprisoned in late April 2008 for funding terrorism and inciting terrorism overseas.  Keeler was joined behind bars by another ASWJ member, the particularly horrible Abu Izzadeen, who also went down for funding and inciting terror overseas.   ASWJ then became Islam4UK and announced the ‘re-launch' of AM in June 2009.  Since then Islam4UK and AM have been interchangeable names for the same group.  So, essentially this group has been operating - and producing terrorists - freely in the UK since 2006 through the shockingly simple tactic of changing its name.

Interestingly, in a message sent out yesterday by the Government's Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU), they reassure us that:

This case has been considered carefully and is based on the Government's assessment that an organisation which is already proscribed - under the names Al Ghurabaa and The Saved Sect - is operating under different names.

The activities of Al Ghurabaa and The Saved Sect in unlawfully glorifying terrorism led to their proscription in 2006. It is right that they are not able to continue their activities by simply changing their name.

[...]A group cannot avoid proscription simply by changing its name.

If Al Muhajiroun should reformulate itself under a different name or names, then those new names will be subject to the same process of consideration for proscription as has resulted in the Order laid on Monday. The Government will not hesitate to add new names to the list if necessary.

The use of an alternative name which is not listed does not prevent the police and Crown Prosecution Service from taking action against an individual for proscription offences if it can be proved that the non-listed name is in fact the same group as a proscribed organisation.

This is all fair enough, but also begs the question: if ‘a group cannot avoid proscription simply by changing its name', why has ASWJ/AM/Islam4uk been able to do just that for over three years?  The answer, I'm afraid, is that Labour has become a ‘party of press releases', by which I mean it does not act out of the best interests of the state but instead at the behest of the latest media frenzy.  It is no coincidence that this ban has come after the public outrage the group caused when it protested against returning soldiers in Luton and recently planned a march in Wootten Bassett, the town now synonymous with the return of fallen soldiers.

This poorly timed ban has needlessly given ammunition to the pro-Islamists who argue that the move is an attempt to silence Muslim critics of the government's foreign policy, a claim which Shiraz Maher dismantled in his blog earlier today.  This argument was put forward yesterday both by Inayat Bunglawala and Islamix, and today the Muslim Brotherhood's IslamOnline site ran a piece entitled ‘UK Bans Muslim Group Over War March' - says it all really.  This all could have been done much more smoothly and effectively, pity that Labour can't put a foot right at the moment.

focusonislamism@standpointmag.co.uk

 
Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
Share/Save
 
 
 
Matt Edwards
January 16th, 2010
12:01 PM
As you rightly say Alex, there is the stated argument for proscription is links to convicted terrorists but unfortunately the suspicious timing will forever be associated with the no-show Wootton Basset march threat. Islamists are winning the propaganda war of words hands down by exploiting the state of moral confusion that exists throughout Europe. We Europeans are in the position of being hoist by our own petard because we are not admitting that Europe, Asia and Africa is being Islamised. It should not be such anathema to defend our post-Enlightenment culture in the face of such major cultural and demographical change. Why I ask are we allowing ourselves to be further shunted down the track to cultural oblivion. Why are we silently being tied to the ME with the invention of the EuroMed agreement without it being the hot topic in Westminster or the supine Western Media? It's too sinister for my imagination to assume anything other than.

Alexander Melea...
January 14th, 2010
8:01 PM
Matt, I dont believe that Choudhary's group was banned because of what its members said, but rather because of their extensive terrorist connections. In fact, one in seven terror related convictions in the UK are directly linked to his group, as research from my organisation shows - see below link: http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/files/1243874438_1.pdf

Matt Edwards
January 14th, 2010
12:01 PM
Banning any group that holds what are considered obnoxious ant-British views is stupid and self defeating if one believes in free speech. Given that we are sending troops do establish Western values including freedom of the press and individuals in various parts of the world is an oxymoron surely. Words and actions that promote an attack on our State from within, are acts of treason and should be countered by stringent measures within the content of the Act. Wm Joyce was executed for treason in 1946 for his words broadcast for the Nazi State; Joyce was not even a British citizen. I would like to see Chaudhry and his chums brought to book in this way rather than the present foolishness which unbdermines one of our primary fundamental rights.

Ex Pat in NYC
January 13th, 2010
6:01 PM
I might have missed you point about the fact that the Labour government acting rather late. But what of the larger point as to whether they or any group should be banned at all? To be part of a group like this means one would have some rather deep seated and distasteful opinions, that in all probability a member would not be able to keep to oneself. I would rather like to hear those opinions and for others to hear them too. But for those that most need to hear these opinions the conversation is changed to the oppression of free speech as opposed to a debate over the groups' ideology. No government should be able to make an arbitrary decision over the voice of its citizens, no matter what a convenient or tasteful consensus may be. We all lose.

Bill Corr
January 13th, 2010
5:01 PM
So Postman Pat, the Trade Unionist muppet at the Home Office, has favourable headlines for a day or two! Terrific!

fredericgeometry
January 13th, 2010
5:01 PM
I can't see how things can't improve after Labour finally falls into the big hole it has spent so much effort digging for itself (and its country). To finally do the right thing, because they have to, and yet turn that very act into a propoganda coup for these people is truly wretched.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
 
About Focus on Islamism

Focus on Islamism is a blog dedicated to analysing and exposing the modern ideological phenomenon known as Islamism.

Shiraz Maher is a writer and broadcaster.

Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens is a research fellow for Westminster based think tank, the Centre for Social Cohesion.  He has contributed to various online and printed publications including, The Daily Telegraph, Lebanon's Daily Star, Standpoint and NOWLebanon. 

To contact the authors, click here

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics