You are here:   Baltimore > Even Great Music Has Its Limits
For the orchestra, likewise, it’s an awkward adjustment. The role of social worker to America’s underclass does not fit easily with the stringent demands of making music at an international level. The Baltimore Symphony depends on wealthy donors to pay its wages. It raises $1.3 million a year to fund OrchKids, but money is getting hard to come by in a city whose centre has been vacated by the middle classes. Baltimore musicians are about the worst-paid in any major US orchestra, on around $70,000 a year. The Peabody Conservatory, America’s oldest, has to market itself in China to maintain student numbers. Music is fighting here for its own survival.

I am dumbstruck with humility at the dedication of the OrchKids tutors I meet — the school secretary who stays on voluntarily after hours and seems to know every child and parent, the singing teacher who exudes rhythm and charisma in equal measure — and still I cannot ignore the glaring gulf between the gravity of the social crisis and the limitations of the musical remedy. What I have seen in Baltimore deepens my nagging disquiet at the universal application of the Sistema model.

El Sistema was designed by José Antonio Abreu, a Venezuelan economist and politician, to rescue barrios urchins from drugs and guns by teaching them a negotiable set of musical skills. It achieved stunning results under one of the world’s most violent and least competent regimes, yielding a flurry of fine soloists and conductors and several Simón Bolívar-branded orchestras that play with a confraternal passion which is as distinctive as it is inimitable. Watching a Bolívar orchestra and chorus of former street kids accompany La Bohème at La Scala, Milan, last summer was, for me, a clinching vindication of the social experiment, at least in respect of its original home base.

Abroad, El Sistema has been embraced as a model for social regeneration in Europe and the US, attracting such high-profile advocates as Leonard Bernstein’s daughter Jamie, the cellist Julian Lloyd Webber and the violinist Nicola Benedetti. However, except in Los Angeles, where Abreu’s brilliant protégé Gustavo Dudamel has driven a compelling YOLA programme among mostly Hispanic youth, El Sistema has failed to demonstrate — on Scottish sink estates and Italian summer camps, for instance — that symphonic music can repair social deprivation and communal disintegration.

Music is music, make of it what you will. Music can enhance life’s achievements and console us in our losses, but it cannot repair the holes at the heart of society. Few, if any, OrchKids will win a $45,000 scholarship at Peabody or a $70,000 job in the Baltimore Symphony. Life is not equipped with happy endings as default. And while my admiration for OrchKids is unqualified, I am increasingly concerned at the assumption it helps to project that music is a panacea for social woes.

There is no proof that classical music does more for unprivileged kids than after-hours football, pottery painting or software design. It may not even be more fun for the children, especially for the significant minority who are tone-deaf or manually undexterous.

El Sistema has fostered a seductive illusion that music is an all-purpose solution. But music has its limits and we need to accept them. It cannot cure cancer, relieve poverty or revive a dying city.

The Baltimore Symphony will celebrate its centenary next year — if Baltimore itself shows the will to survive.
View Full Article
Lawrence Eckerling
December 3rd, 2015
2:12 PM
Music is not going to solve everything. And you are right, it can't cure cancer. But just as musical performance quality is subjective (and can't be quantified with research data), every musician knows that it touches you in your "heart", and taps into feelings beyond places where words take you. That cannot help but make a better person, and that cannot help but improve the society at large. You can't quantify this either, but we know it's true. And I swear, if every person was able to feel things deeply, such a person is much less likely to take a semi-automatic gun and kill 30 people, and then kill him/herself. I can't prove it, but I just know it. Lawrence Eckerling, Music Director, Evanston Symphony Orchestra

December 2nd, 2015
7:12 PM
I do agree with the comments of enemigopublico. What is missing from the envious US reports on El Sistema is the fact that the US already has a well-developed program of training in music and the arts for underserved communities. It was started in innercity settlement schools at the beginning of the 20th century and exists as the membership of the National Guild of Community Arts Education. If you want to give money to help underprivileged kids learn an instrument, find a school in your area on the NGCAE website and make a donation.

November 29th, 2015
5:11 PM
Enimegopublico, does your comment mean that this is not helping these children? Of course it is helping them, and from an orchestra which amongst the orchestras in the USA is not a rich orchestra. Things like this must go on.

November 29th, 2015
11:11 AM
This article injects a very useful dose of sceptical enquiry into a discussion that’s usually romanticized, at times to the point of absurdity. There’s little to argue with in most of it, with the exception of the paragraph on El Sistema in Venezuela, which is wrong in just about every respect. El Sistema wasn’t “designed to rescue barrios urchins from drugs and guns” – it was designed to train up young, predominantly middle-class musicians for Venezuela’s orchestras. Go and check out its first constitution from 1979. The stuff about rescue came much later, when the program came under more pressure to justify its existence. Even now, this aspect is much exaggerated. The chorus accompanying La Bohème in Milan was the National Youth Choir, which includes people of all social strata, not a chorus of former street kids. Its “stunning results” are musical, not social. There is no rigorous evaluation or compelling evidence that shows that it works as a social program, as even its main funder, the Inter-American Development Bank, has admitted. Indeed, Venezuela’s social problems have got worse as El Sistema has got bigger. Given that El Sistema was not created to solve social problems in Venezuela, and there’s no good evidence that it does, it’s hardly surprising if it’s failing to do so outside Venezuela. Norman’s scepticism is more justified than he realises.

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.