You are here:   Academia > We Must Set Our Universities Free
 

The universities are in crisis. Lord Mandelson, the minister responsible, has announced a £1 billion cut in the government's £14 billion budget, and the universities have cried panic. Margins throughout the sector are already so tight, and so many universities are already in deficit, that the chairman and the director general of the Russell Group, the association of the 20 leading universities, have confirmed that "it will take just six months to bring Britain's higher education system to its knees". The president of Universities UK, which represents all 133 British universities, has admitted that "as many as 30 universities may not survive" and that "institutions face having to close hundreds of courses, with fewer academic staff and bigger classes." More than 160,000 students face being turned away from degree courses in the autumn because demand is rising while the number of places falls.


If they can't pay, the university will: Students at a Harvard commencement ceremony 

Meanwhile, the University and College Union has predicted that up to 14,000 staff will be made redundant. Some leading universities, including Imperial College and King's College London, have already announced redundancies, while Leeds (where up to 750 staff may have to go) is just one of the universities where staff have voted to strike. 

Yet this university crisis is unnecessary and has been caused by inappropriate government policies that crowd out private money.

The myth about universities is that they are public goods. The myth asserts that ordinary people would not, if left to their devices, invest sufficiently in their own and in their children's university education. Yet history disproves the myth. The universities were created by the private sector and their misfortune is that they have been nationalised under conditions that have displaced the private money that would have sustained them in good health.  

The first European university was founded by students in Bologna around 1100, initially as a private law school to meet the burgeoning demands of the commercial courts. Soon universities were being created at Montpellier, Padua and other Mediterranean cities, as private student or professorial initiatives. By 1210, Oxford and Cambridge had also been set up as private foundations. But the medieval Church and state did not appreciate independent intellectual power bases, and soon, following the Church's takeover of the University of Paris (1160), all the European universities had been brought under its control, which is why so many academic titles, such as chancellor, dean, doctor, professor and lecturer are ecclesiastical in origin.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Fabio P.Barbieri
April 1st, 2010
4:04 PM
I started reading this article in a mood to agree - the horrendous treatment of Britain's great universities by successive despicable governments, and the all too obvious fact that at least Oxford and Cambridge don't have to take it and could easily privatize themselves without the government being able to do a thing, made me think I would find common ground. Alas, the author is no historian (or if he is, God help the discipline of history) and his ugly, ideologically driven free marketeer ideology makes his contribution virtually worthless. The whole history of German universities, for instance, goes for nothing - except an ill-informed suggestion that they are "dire" and overcrowded. A person who builds on foundations so shaky is obviously not going to create anything worth doing.

James
March 24th, 2010
8:03 PM
My three degress are from state universities in the U. S., and I could not agree with you more fully. Institutions of higher learning must maintain as much independence as possible from the state, including popular passions generated by the state. Perhaps it is ironic that in the United States by far the largest single threat to academic freedom comes from universities and colleges, themselves, via their corrosive and trust-destroying speech codes, codes that seek to ban unpopular speech and speech that is not politically correct. In the 1960s we had stduent sit-ins that demanded freedom of speech, and such sit-ins are needed now more than ever.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.