You are here:   Civilisation >  Books > America's First Lady Of Letters

Gertrude Himmelfarb: No substitute for common sense and decency (images courtesy Encounter Books)

When Gertrude Himmelfarb writes, “Nothing pleases a Labour MP more than to expose the faulty Latin of the honorable gentleman on the opposite bench,” I couldn’t help thinking that she had slipped badly and, in the classic American way, was out of touch with anything outside America. But a glance at the publication credits in Past and Present, a collection of her essays, reveals that her House of Commons observation dates from 1952, when indeed public-school socialists would have been shanking their opponents with deponent verbs.

The writings in Past and Present span 1951 to 2015, and in subject from Xenophon to Caitlyn Jenner. The essays are mostly of the nature of succinct magazine articles, rather than expansive Isaiah Berlin-style ruminations or fully-cited academic work. For once I missed the references because I would love to have known the identity of the 19th-century French writer who announced a chapter on the beaux arts in America, and then snidely stuck in some blank pages.

Himmelfarb’s erudition is impressive and I think I learned something, often a lot, from each essay. I would never have thought about looking to Edmund Burke for an insight on the “War on Terror” or to William James as an antidote to Richard Dawkins.  Nor do you read tributes to Lionel Trilling or Thomas Carlyle every day (I speculate that Lionel Trilling must have had great personal charm, because I find it hard to believe his books were responsible for his 15 minutes of fame).

The subtitle of the book, however — “The Challenges of Modernity from the Pre-Victorians to the Post-Modernists” — seems like an attempt to get hits on a library catalogue search. And is there anything older than modernity? The overseers at Stonehenge probably saw themselves as cutting-edge.

The famous quotation from William Faulkner (and in my opinion his only great line) “The past is never dead. It’s not even past,” is amply illustrated in this collection. The scenery and the costumes may change, but the same questions about how to live life, how to organise society, how to form laws and how they should be respected endure.

Much of the content is delightfully counter-intuitive. Himmelfarb mischievously compares the condition of Jews in France and the United States, and with the endorsement of Tocqueville elaborates how in the land of les philosophes and les libertins, the Jews have been getting it in the neck, whereas in a country where religion was always the bedrock, and not widely seen as antithetical to reason, things were very different.

Perhaps I never read Bagehot’s The English Consitution closely enough, or maybe the phrase quoted by Himmelfarb comes from somewhere else, but Bagehot is the only serious thinker I’ve come across who sincerely lauds stupidity as it is “the most essential mental quality for a free people”. He also berates the “educated classes as being too prone to theorise and generalise, to mistake abstractions for realities” (although I suppose Bagehot’s praise of dimness might tie in with George Orwell’s later assertion about the innate resistance of the British to political extremes).

View Full Article

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.