You are here:   Civilisation >  Books > Information Overload
 
Information Overload
January/February 2014

Jeremy Black: The most prolific historian in Britain and possibly the world 

Jeremy Black is unquestionably the most prolific academic historian in Britain and quite possibly the world.  Born in 1955, he has already earned 143 entries in the Bodleian catalogue, while Cambridge University Library accords him over 200 entries, always assuming that he might be the same Jeremy Black as the one who wrote Sumerian Grammar in Babylonian Theory, which is one of the less riveting books to appear under that byline. The J. Black under consideration here is particularly well-known for his studies of 18th-century British foreign policy, his long and lively sequence of books on warfare since the 15th century, and for his innovative books on cartography, which move beyond the traditional interest in map-making towards a fine appreciation of the political significance of the lines on a map. Such a flow of writing puts him in the category of P.G. Wodehouse, Agatha Christie and Barbara Cartland, though needless to say he is far more serious than any of them. You only have to look at his dazzling array of footnote references to realise that this is someone who has not just written but read more than his peers.

It is no surprise that someone of such prodigious learning and forceful intelligence should now draw together his interests between two covers in what he suggest may be one of his most significant works.  The range of the book is astonishing, as he encompasses China, Japan and India as well as the West, though the emphasis tends to be on the West for good reason: the subject is the way that its agile manipulation of information ensured the ascendancy of the West over other parts of the world. He takes the story back to the early contacts across the Eurasian landmass afforded by the rise of the Mongol empire in the 13th century, an empire that embraced China, Russia, Persia and much else, and continued to link different parts of that landmass even when it had become divided into three great realms. Indeed, in a much admired book by Janet Abu-Lughod called Before European Hegemony, which he cites, the claim has been made that the Mongols were in a sense the architects of the first global economy, by imposing (through war and extermination) peace across this enormous area. Never mind that Abu-Lughod ignores the rich evidence for maritime contact across the Indian Ocean long before the Mongols, or that the silk trade between China and Europe was a mere trickle; this was what some historians wanted to hear when the pack had been sent out to hunt down those whose approach was deemed too "Eurocentric". Black is in a sense Eurocentric, as his subject is the rise of the West, and yet his openness to evidence from other civilisations is refreshing. He is no ideologue, as was Joseph Needham who devoted so much of his long and learned life to the history of Chinese science, and whose central question-why China with its remarkable technological head start did not experience industrialisation and economic take-off-was cast in a rigid Marxist mould. Here we have Black revisiting the comparison between China and the West in stimulating new ways.

The key to the Western advantage is the handling of information, Black insists. He also reminds us that "information, modernity and power are porous categories, necessarily so in the case of this book in order to encompass the variety of working definitions by period, area and topic". This is honest but also worrying. The word "information" is used a great deal. Sometimes it refers to the printing of books and maps or, better, their diffusion once printed. Even so it is not always clear who used the information.  Take the wall-size world map produced in Lorraine by the theologian and cosmographer Martin Waldseemüller in 1507, which he mentions. In tribute to Amerigo Vespucci, the mapmaker added the label "AMERICA" to part of what is now known as South America, but removed the name in later editions. Somehow, though, the name filtered into public consciousness. So how did that happen? This needs to be explained if the concept of "information" is to be shown to be useful. On the other hand, Black makes a characteristically astute point when he says that by marking out South America Waldseemüller effectively created the idea of the Pacific. This was much more effective than the achievement of Balboa in crossing the Isthmus of Panama, immortalised, though erroneously under Cortez's name, by Keats:

 Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes
He star'd at the Pacific-and all his men
Look'd at each other with a wild surmise-
Silent, upon a peak in Darien. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.